Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oh **** you Kansas`

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    The federal government is going to provide federal benefits to married gay couples.

    I don't see how that violates any "states' rights," considering states can still deny state-level benefits if they're one of the backward, bigoted states.
    A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
      The federal government is requiring all federal institutions wherever they are located to provide benefits for gay people.
      Oh, they are so evil that they demand that people are to be treated on equal terms ? Teh Horror !!!
      With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

      Steven Weinberg

      Comment


      • #33
        I don't see how that violates any "states' rights," considering states can still deny state-level benefits if they're one of the backward, bigoted states.
        Weren't you the one arguing that marriage was a 'states rights' issue?

        I called you out as a liar then. Now, I've proven that you never actually believed that. It was just convenient for you at the time.

        Insofar as the state bars recognition of it, Kansas is permitted to do just this. What's next, Obama ruling that states cannot pass marriage laws?
        Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
        "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
        2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

        Comment


        • #34
          Oh, they are so evil that they demand that people are to be treated on equal terms ? Teh Horror !!!
          If it were about equality, why isn't the Christian Baker permitted to decline to serve the gay couple? It's not 'equality' when you believe that their rights trump other people's rights to religious freedom.
          Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
          "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
          2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
            If it were about equality, why isn't the Christian Baker permitted to decline to serve the gay couple? It's not 'equality' when you believe that their rights trump other people's rights to religious freedom.
            Quite simple - you are not allowed to discriminate wether it's based on religion or sexuality. If a baker can't handle this, he should shut down his business without hesitasion.
            With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

            Steven Weinberg

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
              Weren't you the one arguing that marriage was a 'states rights' issue?

              I called you out as a liar then. Now, I've proven that you never actually believed that. It was just convenient for you at the time.

              Insofar as the state bars recognition of it, Kansas is permitted to do just this. What's next, Obama ruling that states cannot pass marriage laws?
              The Department of Justice extending federal benefits to gay couples married in Kansas does not undo Kansas's bigoted law against equal marriage rights.

              Kansas can continue to deny legal recognition to married gay couples, while the federal government grants those couples federal benefits.
              A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

              Comment


              • #37
                Gay marriage, the Danish language, and Christian bakeries? Honestly Ben, instead of revisiting old arguments from other threads, why not address the issue posed in the OP?

                I mean, I know this is the Off Topic, but not one of your posts actually concerns the proposed Kansas law. Under which, it appears you just have to keep calling the fire department until you find a civil servant who would not let a taxpayer's house burn to the ground rather than help a same-sex couple.
                Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
                RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

                Comment


                • #38
                  Bet that a muslim civil servant that followed this law would be considered a terrorist
                  With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                  Steven Weinberg

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Letting private businesses discriminate would probably just allow stupid bigots to send their businesses into bankruptcy by turning away customers, I'm not sure I have a problem with that. Government on the other hand...
                    If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                    ){ :|:& };:

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Elok View Post
                      1. While I am unfamiliar with Kansas politics, I seriously doubt anyone concerned was silly enough to expect this to stand up to judicial review.
                      Oh, I know the teapublicans know their bull**** will get shot down in sort order but that isn't the point nor is any talk of "religious freedom". No, just like every enemy the pick each and every voting cycle the point is just to rally the dullards, work them up into a frenzy of hate, and then say "vote for me!" That's been their only motivation for at least the last 60 years no matter that if the target for their hate campaign keeps changing over time.
                      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                        This is legal everywhere, you can refuse to sell/buy something to/from someone for whatever reason you like and that's a good thing.
                        Want to bet? Go ahead and tell someone that your business doesn't serve people because of race, creed, color, national origin, or religious beliefs and watch as your business is literally destroyed by the courts for criminal behavior. I'd suggest you google what a protected class is.
                        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Businesses that openly serve the general public are not allowed to discriminate based on race. Private transactions are not restricted in that way.
                          If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                          ){ :|:& };:

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Somehow I don't expect any hysteria in the western mass media, because of that.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Quite simple - you are not allowed to discriminate wether it's based on religion or sexuality. If a baker can't handle this, he should shut down his business without hesitasion.
                              Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. The Baker has the right to refuse customers and clients in accordance with his faith, per the 2nd Amendment.

                              Arguing that business owners must comply to clients that they do not want nor need is contrary to freedom of association too. If I assault a business owner, are they required to dispense service? No. They are permitted to blacklist clients.
                              Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                              "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                              2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                The Department of Justice extending federal benefits to gay couples married in Kansas does not undo Kansas's bigoted law against equal marriage rights.
                                Uh, yes, it does. It evades the restriction which is why Kansas has shut down that little scam.

                                Kansas can continue to deny legal recognition to married gay couples, while the federal government grants those couples federal benefits.
                                So, in effect, Kansas has no say as to the marriage laws within their state, and this is an infringement of state sovereignty.

                                The Feds don't have jurisdiction over this in Kansas. Legally, Kansas does. The Feds have the say in areas under their jurisdiction, and not elsewhere.

                                This is destined for the Supremes.
                                Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                                "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                                2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X